DULUTH, Minnesota (AP) - The recording industry won a key fight against illegal music downloading when a federal jury ordered a Minnesota woman to pay $222,000 (euro157,000) for sharing copyrighted music online.

The jury on Thursday ordered Jammie Thomas, 30, to pay the six record companies that sued her $9,250 (euro6,556) for each of 24 songs they focused on in the case. They had alleged she shared 1,702 songs
online in violation of their copyrights.

"She was in tears. She's devastated," Thomas' attorney, Brian Toder, told The Associated Press. "This is a girl that lives from paycheck to paycheck, and now all of a sudden she could get a quarter of her paycheck garnished for the rest of her life."

Richard Gabriel, the lead attorney for the music companies, said,

"This does send a message, I hope, that downloading and distributing our recordings is not OK."

He said no decision had yet been made about what the record companies would do, if anything, to pursue collecting the money from Thomas.

Toder said the plaintiff's attorney fees are automatically awarded in such judgments under copyright law, meaning Thomas could actually owe as much as a half-million dollars (euro355,000). However, he said he suspected the record companies "will probably be people we can deal with."

Jurors left without commenting.

In the first such lawsuit to go to trial, the record companies accused Thomas of downloading the songs without permission and offering them online through a Kazaa file-sharing account. Thomas denied wrongdoing and testified that she didn't have a Kazaa account.

Record companies have filed some 26,000 lawsuits since 2003 over file-sharing, which has hurt sales because it allows people to get music for free instead of paying for recordings in stores. Many other defendants have settled by paying the companies a few thousand dollars.

The RIAA says the lawsuits have mitigated illegal sharing, even though music file-sharing is rising overall. The group says the number of households that have used file-sharing programs to download music has risen from 6.9 million monthly in April 2003, before the lawsuits began, to 7.8 million in March 2007.

During the three-day trial, the record companies presented evidence they said showed the copyrighted songs were offered by a Kazaa user under the name 'tereastarr.' Their witnesses, including officials from an Internet provider and a security firm, testified that the Internet address used by 'tereastarr' belonged to Thomas.

Toder said in his closing that the companies never proved "Jammie Thomas, a human being, got on her keyboard and sent out these things."

"We don't know what happened," Toder told jurors. "All we know is that Jammie Thomas didn't do this."

Gabriel called that defense "misdirection, red herrings, smoke and mirrors."

He told jurors a verdict against Thomas would send a message to other illegal downloaders.

"I only ask that you consider that the need for deterrence here is great," he said.

Copyright law sets a damage range of $750 to $30,000 (euro500 to euro21,000) per infringement, or up to $150,000 (euro106,000) if the violation was 'willful.' Jurors ruled that Thomas' infringement was willful but awarded damages of $9,250 (euro6,556) per song; Gabriel said they did not explain to attorneys afterward how they reached that amount.

Before the verdict, an official with an industry trade group said he was surprised it had taken so long for one of the industry's lawsuits against individual downloaders to come to trial.

Illegal downloads have "become business as usual, nobody really thinks about it," said Cary Sherman, president of the Recording Industry Association of America, which coordinates the lawsuits.

"This case has put it back in the news. Win or lose, people will understand that we are out there trying to protect our rights."

The record companies involved in the lawsuit are Sony BMG, Arista Records LLC, Interscope Records, UMG Recordings Inc., Capitol Records Inc. and Warner Bros. Records Inc.